Rewrite of CMC-description
What about this?
“Particl Coin (PART) is needed for its privacy features and to economically secure both the blockchain and the settlement of every marketplace purchase via an automated escrow system, in which parties may be penalised if they fail to uphold their agreements.”
@Pancake I overhauled my initial text. It addresses the coin in the first place and shows its economical implications. Then it shows the benefits of the marketplace and makes a summary of the project and technology at the end. So all the buzz-words are separated from the important stuff.
Looking good guys!
Though, do you reaaaaaaly want to put that “Not an ICO” thing in? I guess you recall the Telegram chat we had about it. My concern is that even if its true it isn’t a very compelling message but in the eyes of some (like me) it is incorrect and therefore false advertising on the largest billboard in the sector - which isn’t a great look.
I see your point and I took the “Not an ICO …” part off the proposed text.
I’d like to use your both proposed CMC-descriptions (yours and @dros) as a first test of particl community voting procedures. Therefore, I will set up a document where both your proposed descriptions are brought up and given as voting options. It might still take a few days but I hope it’s for both of you ok.
Goal is, that at a later point every community member can set up proposals for community voting in a defined manner, and that most of the community will have a chance to become notified and informed in time.
So is that three options in the vote? Mine, Dros 's and your blended one?
We can put as many options to vote on as we like.
But finally we might run into a problem as still to be discussed in here
My blended one is pretty close to your initial proposal. I would remove the ICO part and then put yours (the blended one), dros’ and the “old” description up to vote.
The proposal document could look like this:
(Sorry, I’m somehow not allowed to upload pdf’s)
Here is also an editable link to the corresponding DropBox-Paper: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/rrsjut64zoiy68uk1szbu/Voting-on-CMC-description.paper?dl=0&rlkey=i220752ugv5r2jas30k43x32q
I still included the ICO part on dros’ paper.
Also @dros, feel free to still edit the paper as you like.
Please just let me know whether the text and the title is ok for you both and I will try to set up things for community voting.
Thanks a lot for your input.
Let’s become this community more active.
Fantastic work, thanks Pancake. Go for it!
Likewise Dros. Thanks for engaging and improving the conversation.