14-(C) - False winner with multiple voting options
Pancake - last edited by Pancake
I think the way to vote, or how to determine the vote winner, should be part of 6-(E) a clearly formulated proposal description. There are already different conventional approaches like “rounds-based-voting”, …
Which one in which cases to use and how to implement into marketplace should be to discuss.
Pancake - last edited by
In correspondance with 4-(G) I see multiple voting options (> 2 options) only for informal votings. Binding votings should be limited to only 2 voting options (yes/no) but maybe with a possibility to split his votes (20% yes / 80% no). 50%/50% would correspond to an abstention from voting.