4-(G) - Distinguish votings based on their importance

  • -

    Most other governance models have different voting categories, depending on their impact on the overall project development. I think we should also define at least two different categories.

  • -

    For “official binding” votes, particl foundation is planning a voting concept based on staking voting (or something similar, integrated into “Partyman”).

    However, for merely “informal” votes, we can already use the existing voting platform on particl marketplace. So we should make clear, that votings on the particl marketplace are only meant as “non-binding” votes and maybe can be seen as preliminary vote before a proposal becomes accredited as a later binding vote.

    Thus we could make a distinction between two kind of votes:

    • informal votes

    • binding votes

    What do you think?
    Other comments and feedback on this?

Log in to reply