Navigation

    Particl Community

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    1. Home
    2. Popular
    Log in to post
    • All categories
    • Announcements
    • Particl News & Updates
    •      Foundation
    • General discussions
    •      Contests
    •      Trading
    •      Airdrop, Faucets and Betting
    • Privacy & Independence
    • Community Governance [Proposals]
    •      #self-governance
    • Marketing & Outreach [Awareness]
    • Feature requests
    •      Bounties
    • Local Communities
    •      Deutsch
    •      Français
    •      Español
    •      Pусский
    • Marketplace General
    •      Comments & Feedback
    •      Troubleshoots
    • Sellers
    • Marketplace Testing
    • Development
    •      Bots
    • All Topics
    • New Topics
    • Watched Topics
    • Unreplied Topics
    • All Time
    • Day
    • Week
    • Month

    • 5
      ffmad

      [Closed] Satoshi Club x Particl AMA: Get your ticket to participate
      Contests • particl ama satoshi club • 40 • ffmad

      546 40

      @Maksyrn said in Satoshi Club x Particl AMA: Get your ticket to participate: PhTdCoSVW5UVfyNV91q92HDu5u1gzfM1fw @Cryptolove97 said in Satoshi Club x Particl AMA: Get your ticket to participate: PsqN1V9wkmsqwqwTf7FmvDSDAf13ARMF7m Hi , I m going to purchase ticket , send me 0.01 PART now !! @dudupham209 said in Satoshi Club x Particl AMA: Get your ticket to participate: PmTEREoxFT9zpdNtaFqfhhAJ6CmrHxCpQu send me 1 PART plz,thanks sir @HNHoa said in Satoshi Club x Particl AMA: Get your ticket to participate: Send me some Part for the ticket, thank you Pdisr4CwVGFXydVSuLo58NLVi6fFW5YEra Sent

      par ffmad ffmad

    • 2
      ffmad

      [ Win 3x500 PART ] by buying a free Lottery ticket on marketplace for Particl 3rd Anniversary! 🎂 // end 24th July
      Contests • marketplace 3rd anniversary contest lottery • 34 • ffmad

      444 34

      I put first name : lodr last name :koe

      par L lodrkoe19

    • 2
      dadon

      Pin code over password for some functions?
      General discussions • 26 • dadon

      211 26

      @zaSmilingIdiot “Or alternatively, let the user unlock the wallet, perform all their necessary sending actions, and then lock it as quickly afterwards to ensure the full protection of the wallet again?” well Isn’t the only way to completely remove the need for the password to not encrypt the wallet at creation? if there was a way you could disable the password completely somehow and then turn it back on i would consider this even better then having a pin tbh but it doesn’t seem very safe or possible. but maybe I am wrong I am no expert on the matter. “But assuming that this feature is then implemented in the desktop only, then this means that the desktop needs to temporarily (in memory) store the password, AND the pin: when the pin input is later used by the user and matched correctly, then the desktop needs to send the temporarily stored password to core. It needs the password to be stored, because it needs to send this to core to do the actual unlocking”. I can see why this could be worrisome security wise but is this not what happens when you unlock for staking if not cold staking ofc. “Firstly, is this a core feature or a desktop feature?” i think it would only be really needed for marketplace features so I am guessing it would be a desktop feature.

      par dadon dadon

    • 6
      btmr

      Thoughts on community testing for Particl Desktop 2.4.0.
      Marketplace Testing • 24 • btmr

      286 24

      This is all awesome. I’ll make sure we spread this through our usual communications channels a few days before testnet goes live and while the testing phase is ongoing so that we can get as many testers as possible. Thanks for making this into a well streamlined process, I’m sure the devs will appreciate the thoroughness of this a lot

      par CryptoGuard CryptoGuard

    • 1
      Pancake

      5-(B) - Security issue of coins
      #self-governance • 22 • Pancake

      171 22

      I summarized the outcome of this discussions here, and will close this topic. In regard to staking voting I still want to refer to following link, https://hackernoon.com/voting-determines-the-conversation-how-to-think-about-staking-tokens-3f152185313a where also some issues being discribed which later might become of interest as well (e.g. 14-( C))

      par Pancake Pancake

    • 3
      C.Skywalker

      Memes, GIFs etc.
      General discussions • 22 • C.Skywalker

      228 22

      THIS IS (S)PARTA!

      par C.Skywalker C.Skywalker

    • 1
      ffmad

      [Bounties] Community bounties (Translations, Awareness, etc...)
      General discussions • 20 • ffmad

      381 20

      @Allien said in [Bounties] Community bounties (Translations, Awareness, etc...): Btw shouldn’t Bounties be rather a category than a single thread? That would allow anybody to post their own… (I know I’d make use of them, as before, hehe) We could have one yes

      par ffmad ffmad

    • 1
      dadon

      Call in Radio shows to contact and similar(US).
      Marketing & Outreach [Awareness] • 18 • dadon

      135 18

      Project Archivist 734-681-0459 Email: Projectarchivist@gmail.com https://twitter.com/ProjectArchivis https://www.facebook.com/groups/134710376604360/ About Show: A Podcast that looks at the world of the weird, the wonderful and the strange with a touch of humor. Every week Roejen and Lobo take a look at the world of the esoteric with interviews, round table discussion or just covering the weirdest news. Our goal is to try to teach people something different and maybe have a good laugh

      par dadon dadon

    • 5
      ffmad

      Encrypted messaging development
      Development • demarkets.io development messaging • 17 • ffmad

      125 17

      maybe a private mode where you can have your client only accept messages from addresses in your contacts? this could help with the spam issue

      par L letsparty

    • 1
      particltribe

      Particltribe - Image collection
      Marketing & Outreach [Awareness] • 15 • particltribe

      144 15

      par particltribe particltribe

    • 1
      Pancake

      Rewrite of CMC-description
      Marketing & Outreach [Awareness] • 15 • Pancake

      159 15

      @Pancake said in Rewrite of CMC-description: (Sorry, I’m somehow not allowed to upload pdf’s) I fixed this

      par ffmad ffmad

    • 3
      dros

      Community task: Translate Particl trailer video
      Marketing & Outreach [Awareness] • 13 • dros

      184 13

      @dadon there are platforms for professional narrators. I just need to get the audio track of the narrator. Putting it together can be done in-house here. So no overhead cost.

      par dros dros

    • 1
      dadon

      "proof of stock" Feature.
      Feature requests • 12 • dadon

      105 12

      @Pancake Yeah I don’t know enough about what is possible to expect dev team to be able to make the system automatize this process I think for now the best way is to just allow the potential buyer to cross check it themselves. but in the future when the platform has more users it could be possible to approve via voting but even then it would cause delays if people were not actively voting/approving so it would need to be incentivized somehow. so best option is just allow users to verify for themselves by cross checking the code provided by the system to the code provided by the seller in the photo.

      par dadon dadon

    • 2
      Pancake

      1-(J) - Commonly accepted communication platform
      #self-governance • 12 • Pancake

      95 12

      Herewith I close this discussion and will sum the outcome as follows: Particl Community Forum will be choosen as primary choice for proposals and structured community discussions

      par Pancake Pancake

    • 4
      C.Skywalker

      1. Test: Weekly Particl Community Lottery (Week 33)
      General discussions • 12 • C.Skywalker

      171 12

      par C.Skywalker C.Skywalker

    • 0
      Pancake

      8-(D) - Repetetive proposals when denied
      #self-governance • 11 • Pancake

      141 11

      @btmr said in 8-(D) - Repetetive proposals when denied: Ok, then let’s get rid of that damn second round for now Only to make sure we talk of the same voting causes. During final “voting period” there’s a “second” vote done by stake voting and outgoing transaction voting. During “proposal period” I still would do some preliminary selection or ranking, also based on a kind of voting (either funding or number of outgoing transactions), thus making it easier during “voting period” to distinguish between serious and spam proposals. Maybe you as voter during the “voting period” have only limited time and thus want only voting for the top 5 proposals and so ignoring the remaining x-hundred proposals. The benefit of funding I see in the increased amount of “skin” you can put into the game If you or any other community member think your proposal is really important to make a decision on, you can support it in an easy way with a significant amount of PART by one single transactions to the proposals specific address. When doing this by outgoing transactions with a fixed amount, you might have to send many transactions to signal your opinion of a high importance for this specific proposal. I agree, if one kind of ranking would be sufficient, it would be easier when not having the need for weighting in some form. Have a nice weekend

      par Pancake Pancake

    • 1
      Pancake

      200603-01 - blind balance / privacy by default
      Community Governance [Proposals] • 10 • Pancake

      283 10

      I have confidence that the level of anonimity will only increase over time as the team will logically look for ways to increase it. Preferably making this protocol anonymous by default. I was very specifically referring to some other changes/suggestions which seem more important short term and can be adopted instantly. Such as prioritizing marketplace functionality over wallet functionality, making the app more about buying, selling, shopping instead of a dashboard with transactions, coin counts and such when you open the application.

      par W whiterussians

    • 1
      dros

      Instant escrow for sellers
      Feature requests • 9 • dros

      106 9

      @dros said in Instant escrow for sellers: May you add this to the attention points in the document? Done

      par Pancake Pancake

    • 0
      Pancake

      6-(E) - Misinterpretation of "bad" formulated proposals
      #self-governance • 9 • Pancake

      85 9

      I again summarized the points mentioned. I emphasized the need for a trustless long-time storage medium for each proposal. Thus I prefered to use the particl blockchain instead of any third party provider, as e.g. github. I will temporarily leave this topic up for discussion and will close then in a few days.

      par Pancake Pancake

    • 1
      ffmad

      Hello Particl
      General discussions • 8 • ffmad

      104 8

      @NotACarreraS

      par dadon dadon

    2020 - Particl Community | Not affiliated with Particl Foundation | Framework by NodeBB