@Maksyrn said in Satoshi Club x Particl AMA: Get your ticket to participate: PhTdCoSVW5UVfyNV91q92HDu5u1gzfM1fw @Cryptolove97 said in Satoshi Club x Particl AMA: Get your ticket to participate: PsqN1V9wkmsqwqwTf7FmvDSDAf13ARMF7m Hi , I m going to purchase ticket , send me 0.01 PART now !! @dudupham209 said in Satoshi Club x Particl AMA: Get your ticket to participate: PmTEREoxFT9zpdNtaFqfhhAJ6CmrHxCpQu send me 1 PART plz,thanks sir @HNHoa said in Satoshi Club x Particl AMA: Get your ticket to participate: Send me some Part for the ticket, thank you Pdisr4CwVGFXydVSuLo58NLVi6fFW5YEra Sent

par ffmad

I put first name : lodr last name :koe

par L lodrkoe19

Particl Historic event Secured! Download https://i.ibb.co/GTnWJGv/DAC3-AE37-27-A3-445-B-866-A-1-DFA84-E0-DE63.jpg

par Cyberpunk

@zaSmilingIdiot “Or alternatively, let the user unlock the wallet, perform all their necessary sending actions, and then lock it as quickly afterwards to ensure the full protection of the wallet again?” well Isn’t the only way to completely remove the need for the password to not encrypt the wallet at creation? if there was a way you could disable the password completely somehow and then turn it back on i would consider this even better then having a pin tbh but it doesn’t seem very safe or possible. but maybe I am wrong I am no expert on the matter. “But assuming that this feature is then implemented in the desktop only, then this means that the desktop needs to temporarily (in memory) store the password, AND the pin: when the pin input is later used by the user and matched correctly, then the desktop needs to send the temporarily stored password to core. It needs the password to be stored, because it needs to send this to core to do the actual unlocking”. I can see why this could be worrisome security wise but is this not what happens when you unlock for staking if not cold staking ofc. “Firstly, is this a core feature or a desktop feature?” i think it would only be really needed for marketplace features so I am guessing it would be a desktop feature.

par dadon

This is all awesome. I’ll make sure we spread this through our usual communications channels a few days before testnet goes live and while the testing phase is ongoing so that we can get as many testers as possible. Thanks for making this into a well streamlined process, I’m sure the devs will appreciate the thoroughness of this a lot

par CryptoGuard

@Allien said in [Bounties] Community bounties (Translations, Awareness, etc...): Btw shouldn’t Bounties be rather a category than a single thread? That would allow anybody to post their own… (I know I’d make use of them, as before, hehe) We could have one yes

par ffmad

Project Archivist 734-681-0459 Email: Projectarchivist@gmail.com https://twitter.com/ProjectArchivis https://www.facebook.com/groups/134710376604360/ About Show: A Podcast that looks at the world of the weird, the wonderful and the strange with a touch of humor. Every week Roejen and Lobo take a look at the world of the esoteric with interviews, round table discussion or just covering the weirdest news. Our goal is to try to teach people something different and maybe have a good laugh

par dadon

maybe a private mode where you can have your client only accept messages from addresses in your contacts? this could help with the spam issue

par L letsparty

@Pancake said in Rewrite of CMC-description: (Sorry, I’m somehow not allowed to upload pdf’s) I fixed this

par ffmad

par particltribe

@dadon there are platforms for professional narrators. I just need to get the audio track of the narrator. Putting it together can be done in-house here. So no overhead cost.

par dros

@Pancake Yeah I don’t know enough about what is possible to expect dev team to be able to make the system automatize this process I think for now the best way is to just allow the potential buyer to cross check it themselves. but in the future when the platform has more users it could be possible to approve via voting but even then it would cause delays if people were not actively voting/approving so it would need to be incentivized somehow. so best option is just allow users to verify for themselves by cross checking the code provided by the system to the code provided by the seller in the photo.

par dadon

par C.Skywalker

I have confidence that the level of anonimity will only increase over time as the team will logically look for ways to increase it. Preferably making this protocol anonymous by default. I was very specifically referring to some other changes/suggestions which seem more important short term and can be adopted instantly. Such as prioritizing marketplace functionality over wallet functionality, making the app more about buying, selling, shopping instead of a dashboard with transactions, coin counts and such when you open the application.

par W whiterussians

@dros said in Instant escrow for sellers: May you add this to the attention points in the document? Done

par Pancake