Navigation

    Particl Community

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    1. Home
    2. General discussions
    • Contests

      For Particl Community contests

      2
      Topics
      74
      Posts

      [ Win 3x500 PART ] by buying a free Lottery ticket on marketplace for Particl 3rd Anniversary! 🎂 // end 24th July

      par L lodrkoe19

    • Trading

      A place to talk about whatever you want

      1
      Topics
      2
      Posts

      Hummingbot/liquidity bot

      par B Brainchest

    • Airdrop, Faucets and Betting

      For discussions about airdrop, faucets and betting

      1
      Topics
      4
      Posts

      Luckygames.pro - provably fair PARTICL online casino - Faucet|Jackpot|Contests and more!

      par LuckyParticl LuckyParticl

    Log in to post
    Catégorie General discussions
    • 0
      M

      psychic Hong Kong Business Email List readings
      1 • mehedilatest

      4 1

      No one has replied

    • 0
      C.Skywalker

      PARTICL COMMUNITY LOTTERY (1. October Round: 01.10-13.10.2020)
      3 • C.Skywalker

      21 3

      par C.Skywalker C.Skywalker

    • 3
      C.Skywalker

      Particl Community Fund
      7 • C.Skywalker

      40 7

      Vote:

      par C.Skywalker C.Skywalker

    • 2
      C.Skywalker

      PARTICL COMMUNITY LOTTERY (September Round)
      6 • C.Skywalker

      30 6

      par C.Skywalker C.Skywalker

    • 1
      L

      Translators WANTED (for 17 languages)
      5 • LocalParticl.com

      25 5

      always a pleasure

      par C.Skywalker C.Skywalker

    • 3
      C.Skywalker

      Memes, GIFs etc.
      22 • C.Skywalker

      228 22

      THIS IS (S)PARTA!

      par C.Skywalker C.Skywalker

    • 4
      C.Skywalker

      1. Test: Weekly Particl Community Lottery (Week 33)
      12 • C.Skywalker

      171 12

      par C.Skywalker C.Skywalker

    • 2
      C.Skywalker

      2. Test: Weekly Particl Community Lottery (Week 34)
      2 • C.Skywalker

      63 2

      par C.Skywalker C.Skywalker

    • 2
      C.Skywalker

      Weekly Particl Community Lottery (Week 36)
      2 • C.Skywalker

      23 2

      par C.Skywalker C.Skywalker

    • 3
      M

      Network confidentiality related parameters
      4 • mbacoinin

      141 4

      In a german article there has been an interessting comment from “Paul Janowitz” in regards to the current state of privacy for monero. It also covers a part with potential privacy issues when dealing with RingSignatures. Following you find an auto-translated part of his comment: "If your life depends on privacy, you should definitely know what you are doing, because there are certain edge cases where you invade your privacy yourself, among them E-A-E (Exchange - Alice - Exchange): Assuming that the Exchanges are even different but regulated, you can assume that they share existing data with third parties. Exchange 1, of course, knows what output Alice got, and if it appears in a ring that moves to Exchange 2, it is a hit with a probability of 1:11, or a hit that can be clearly ruled out if the output of E1 was smaller than the input at E2. Summary of outputs: If a user makes daily payouts from a marketplace and this marketplace is infiltrated, the respective outputs (UTXO) are known and if a transaction is propagated, which summarizes these outputs in rings (e.g. 10 rings with 11 possible outputs each), but in each ring exactly one known output is present, one can say with almost 100% certainty, who created it. Very old outputs: The Monero Wallet warns if you want to combine several very old outputs, because statistically, younger UTXOs are used in Bitcoin much more often than old ones and the selection of mixin outputs in Monero is based on this. If I combine two old outputs close to each other into one transaction, it is very likely that these two are the correct ones, even if the ring size is currently 11. IP Address of Propagation: IP addresses are a very strong metadata and are now protected by Dandelion++ by default by first forwarding the transaction to one node only and only after some hops wide. Additional protection is provided by Tor and I2P support, which is not active by default. Against most of the potential attacks mentioned above, the generally known “churning”, where you send a transaction to yourself, already helps. An automatic churning of old outputs similar to Samourai’s liquidity providers is currently being discussed, because with each churn you remove your output further from potentially logging exchanges and other players." PS. It’s also being mentioned, that Triptych will further increase the anon-set while remaining the size of the RingSignatures constant.

      par Pancake Pancake

    • 3
      M

      Particl Project is and will be Open Source
      2 • mbacoinin

      16 2

      Particl = true Cypherpunks "If you don’t believe me or don’t get it, I don’t have time to try to convince you , sorry" -Satoshi Nakamoto

      par C.Skywalker C.Skywalker

    • 1
      Pancake

      Whiterussians critics and complaints
      1 • Pancake

      44 1

      No one has replied

    • 3
      C.Skywalker

      Ledger bugs regarding their firmware update 1.6
      3 • C.Skywalker

      101 3

      @letsparty did you tell em they do this since 5 months now…? im mean seriously… But thx for taking the time to email them

      par C.Skywalker C.Skywalker

    • 2
      dadon

      Pin code over password for some functions?
      26 • dadon

      211 26

      @zaSmilingIdiot “Or alternatively, let the user unlock the wallet, perform all their necessary sending actions, and then lock it as quickly afterwards to ensure the full protection of the wallet again?” well Isn’t the only way to completely remove the need for the password to not encrypt the wallet at creation? if there was a way you could disable the password completely somehow and then turn it back on i would consider this even better then having a pin tbh but it doesn’t seem very safe or possible. but maybe I am wrong I am no expert on the matter. “But assuming that this feature is then implemented in the desktop only, then this means that the desktop needs to temporarily (in memory) store the password, AND the pin: when the pin input is later used by the user and matched correctly, then the desktop needs to send the temporarily stored password to core. It needs the password to be stored, because it needs to send this to core to do the actual unlocking”. I can see why this could be worrisome security wise but is this not what happens when you unlock for staking if not cold staking ofc. “Firstly, is this a core feature or a desktop feature?” i think it would only be really needed for marketplace features so I am guessing it would be a desktop feature.

      par dadon dadon

    • 0
      particltribe

      This topic is deleted!
      1 • particltribe

      2 1

      No one has replied

    • 2
      dadon

      Projects that have forked or cloned Particl code for their own use.
      5 • dadon

      102 5

      @zaSmilingIdiot said in Projects that have forked or cloned Particl code for their own use.: Ghost by McAfee? we can add them when it’s really released and functional

      par ffmad ffmad

    • 2
      C.Skywalker

      rebirth of the AMA !!
      6 • C.Skywalker

      74 6

      @zaSmilingIdiot Thanks for your answers.

      par T tux

    • 1
      ffmad

      [Bounties] Community bounties (Translations, Awareness, etc...)
      20 • ffmad

      381 20

      @Allien said in [Bounties] Community bounties (Translations, Awareness, etc...): Btw shouldn’t Bounties be rather a category than a single thread? That would allow anybody to post their own… (I know I’d make use of them, as before, hehe) We could have one yes

      par ffmad ffmad

    • 3
      CryptoGuard

      [Bounty Proposal] Development Bounty for Listing PART on Flare Wallet (Privacy, Security, and Atomic Swaps)
      1 • CryptoGuard

      444 1

      No one has replied

    • 2
      L

      Inaugural Particl March Madness Bracket Pool
      3 • letsparty

      52 3

      This is a really neat idea! Thanks for doing it.

      par R raydonovan

    2020 - Particl Community | Not affiliated with Particl Foundation | Framework by NodeBB